10mm-Auto

Other Ammunition Calibers => Reloading => Topic started by: RDub01 on October 21 2022 11:43:25 AM MDT

Title: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on October 21 2022 11:43:25 AM MDT
Hello
Going through some archives and came across this I wrote up back in ?13. Not sure where I posted it, it I did at all. It was centered around what 300-MP could do in .44 Mag. Thought it might be of interest.

Well thought it was time to do a quick test to see what 300-MP can do in the .44 Mag.
It did spectacularly in the .357?s so I was assuming I would see the same kind of thing with the .44 Magnum.

http://www.smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/267122-357-mag-158gr-study.html

The only bullet I have any quantity of right now are some Remington 240gr Jacked Hollow Points.  Six rounds each were assembled at max pressure with 300-MP and each of the following powders;

2400
296
H-110
Lil?gun
N-110
AA 5744
AA #9

AA 5744 was thrown in there just as a curiosity.  The data on the can says 24.0grs = 1470fps.  I wonder if this is for a rifle..

I'm saving what Blue Dot I have left for 10mm ammo.

So, these were shot at 25 yards off of a Caldwell pistol rest. The gun is sighted in for a lighter load.
Velocities were taken with an Oehler Model 33 chronograph.  Skyscreens centered 10? from the muzzle.
Data is velocity, velocity spread, standard deviation and temperature. Targets are 5?"

(https://i.postimg.cc/h4kxNRpY/Rem240-JHP-300-MP-resized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

I regret that I don?t have any factory loads to compare against, but actually I haven?t shot any .44 Mag factory stuff in a long time.

Well, the first thing I noticed is that 2400, 296, H-110 and AA#9 are all virtually identical in performance and accuracy, with #9 being the accuracy winner, at least in this gun.  Also of interest,  H-110 and 296 came in with virtually identical spreads and SD.

300-MP did outperform the others, but not by very much, save Lil?gun. It is fast, but I couldn?t keep the Lil?gun group on the target. I shot six rounds but I?m not sure where #6 went. Looks like #6 might have skinned the very bottom of the target. There might be a primer/powder combination that shoots better.
Until now, I haven?t worked with Lil?gun in .44 Mag. Human error being what it is, one never knows...

I believe that N-110 can be bumped up a notch which would bring it up with the others.

I recall shooting this bullet into water filled one gallon milk jugs with a full power load and discovering the expansion was massive. Half the bullet was gone. Couldn?t imagine what the bullet would look like if shot out of a rifle.  Thinking at the time this bullet would be ideal for a warm .44 Special SD load.

Anyway, that?s how today went.
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: tommac919 on October 22 2022 06:12:35 AM MDT
Nice data...

I always liked the 2400.
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Kenk on October 22 2022 08:53:38 AM MDT
Thanks, some great info, I used to have a Ruger 44 Carbine brush gun, sure regret getting rid of that years ago
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on October 22 2022 09:29:04 AM MDT
Yep, I had one of those carbines also.. I too regret letting it go. It was very popular among the wild hog hunters in central California back in the '70's 80's..
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Kenk on October 22 2022 09:39:20 AM MDT
Have thought about buying another one, but the prices are crazy high, as with my old Nylon 66, sure regret selling that one too : (
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Alaska on October 22 2022 03:13:08 PM MDT
Missing One

HP-38 @ 9.5
With 240

H110 and 296 same powder
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on October 22 2022 06:42:07 PM MDT
H110 and 296 same powder

Yep, that's why they were identical in performance..
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: The_Shadow on October 22 2022 07:17:18 PM MDT
While Blue Dot may not produce the highest velocity with those 240 grain 44 Mag's 16.2 grains is my accuracy load...
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Kenk on October 22 2022 07:36:58 PM MDT
Not sure what it is about BD, but sure like it, that and BE-86
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on October 23 2022 09:24:06 AM MDT
Hey Kenk.. Since you brought up BE-86..
I was looking at making some cast bullet mid-range loads with the .44 Mag using some molds I have.. BE-86 proved to be quite useful :)

With the 240gr LEE mold;

(https://i.postimg.cc/TwnQ9T8F/6-5-20-sized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

With the 255gr Lyman 429421 mold;

(https://i.postimg.cc/JzgqCsMS/255-Cast-5-24-20-sized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

And back when BE-86 first started showing up I was playing around with the Lyman 42798 mold with BE-86. It's a bit undersized but it shoots OK. Been using it as a plinker since the early 70's.

(https://i.postimg.cc/vTf1GD3N/DSC01556-resized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

(https://i.postimg.cc/wTDJp4rj/42798-cast-BE-86-2-16-resized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Don't recall every trying any max pressure loads with BE-86..





Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: The_Shadow on October 23 2022 11:40:13 AM MDT
Awesome Range report Randy!  Thanks!
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Alaska on October 24 2022 09:18:55 PM MDT
Suggest try HP-38 at 9.5 to 10 with 240 XTP and CCI 300 in 44 mag.
A good load for a SW 629 4” .
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on October 25 2022 09:27:40 AM MDT
Ok, I'm game.. I think I can find some extra brass and load up a few samples. The weather has turned rather soupy around here, so when a break happens I'll shoot some.
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: sparkyv on October 29 2022 07:53:08 PM MDT
I always appreciate your testing, and more importantly, that you share your results. 

For me in my modern M629, I find that H110/W296 gives the the best performance and highest velocities using a 240gr hardcast EK projectiles, and 2400 is my standard powder for mid to hot loads, with #9 following closely.  I use HP38/W231 for warmup Cat Sneezes, and plan to test Longshot soon, but I've found very little LS data.  TBD.

Quote from: RDub01 on October 21 2022 11:43:25 AM MDT
Hello
Going through some archives and came across this I wrote up back in ?13. Not sure where I posted it, it I did at all. It was centered around what 300-MP could do in .44 Mag. Thought it might be of interest.

Well thought it was time to do a quick test to see what 300-MP can do in the .44 Mag.
It did spectacularly in the .357?s so I was assuming I would see the same kind of thing with the .44 Magnum.

http://www.smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/267122-357-mag-158gr-study.html

The only bullet I have any quantity of right now are some Remington 240gr Jacked Hollow Points.  Six rounds each were assembled at max pressure with 300-MP and each of the following powders;

2400
296
H-110
Lil?gun
N-110
AA 5744
AA #9

AA 5744 was thrown in there just as a curiosity.  The data on the can says 24.0grs = 1470fps.  I wonder if this is for a rifle..

I'm saving what Blue Dot I have left for 10mm ammo.

So, these were shot at 25 yards off of a Caldwell pistol rest. The gun is sighted in for a lighter load.
Velocities were taken with an Oehler Model 33 chronograph.  Skyscreens centered 10? from the muzzle.
Data is velocity, velocity spread, standard deviation and temperature. Targets are 5?"

(https://i.postimg.cc/h4kxNRpY/Rem240-JHP-300-MP-resized.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

I regret that I don?t have any factory loads to compare against, but actually I haven?t shot any .44 Mag factory stuff in a long time.

Well, the first thing I noticed is that 2400, 296, H-110 and AA#9 are all virtually identical in performance and accuracy, with #9 being the accuracy winner, at least in this gun.  Also of interest,  H-110 and 296 came in with virtually identical spreads and SD.

300-MP did outperform the others, but not by very much, save Lil?gun. It is fast, but I couldn?t keep the Lil?gun group on the target. I shot six rounds but I?m not sure where #6 went. Looks like #6 might have skinned the very bottom of the target. There might be a primer/powder combination that shoots better.
Until now, I haven?t worked with Lil?gun in .44 Mag. Human error being what it is, one never knows...

I believe that N-110 can be bumped up a notch which would bring it up with the others.

I recall shooting this bullet into water filled one gallon milk jugs with a full power load and discovering the expansion was massive. Half the bullet was gone. Couldn?t imagine what the bullet would look like if shot out of a rifle.  Thinking at the time this bullet would be ideal for a warm .44 Special SD load.

Anyway, that?s how today went.
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: RDub01 on November 01 2022 02:28:40 PM MDT
Well Alaska, you were right!

I didn't have any new style Hornady bullets, but I did find some these..

(https://i.postimg.cc/hvKcs78H/Unknown-Bullets.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

There were in a generic box labeled 240gr JHP.. They look like old style Hornady bullets, but can't be sure what they are. Anyway I loaded up six rounds with 9.7grs. HP-38; compromise between 9.5 and 10.0grs. But, before I shot these, I ordered a new Hogue grip. When younger the recoil with the factory grips didn't bother me a bit, but now at 70, I just decided it's no fun anymore..  They arrived yesterday.

(https://i.postimg.cc/GpvWfmpr/New-Grip.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

New grips on, a break in the weather, so shot the six rounds at 25 yards. So much better with the new grips.

(https://i.postimg.cc/hjLKV0mL/11-1-22.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/VrNy8nDv)

Not sure where that flyer came from, but five out of six,.. I'll take it.

Now I'm curious how HP-38 might work with some heavier hard cast...





Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Alaska on November 02 2022 11:06:26 AM MDT
This 9.5 load HP-38 is my 629 SW load with 240?s
In your Ruger I have a H110 at 22.8 with 255gr Hard Cast SWC and mag primers CCI 350.
Now this is accurate but a Full magnum load in 44mag handgun.
As you go up in bullet weight recoil goes up also.
For most of carry here in Alaska in 629 I much prefer the HP 38 load and 240 XTP or my old Norma 240s FNSP bullets being my favorite.

Lucky me I have accumulated enough of the old Norma 240’s bullets to last me the rest of my life.
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: mr.revolverguy on December 16 2022 08:50:55 PM MST
New Comer on the scene Alliant 300-Mp I am loving what I see
Used in 357 Magnum Gel Test Here
https://dayattherange.com/?p=10201
https://dayattherange.com/?p=10262
Title: Re: .44 Magnum; Powder Comparison
Post by: Kenk on December 17 2022 05:59:35 AM MST
Excellent article, Thanks!