Quote from: The_Shadow on July 20 2016 08:07:29 PM MDT
Jäger, Welcome to the forum! Thanks for your report but I have seen more than that much powder being used in the 10mm
7.8 grains of Longshot.
Well thanks, although as I mentioned I've been hanging around here practically since the beginning, and eventually actually took the time to register. Just didn't have any questions up to this point that a site search wouldn't answer, nor did I have anything to add.
I knew the load when I went to the range, and I did cross reference it with another search of the site here to see where 7.8 grains of Longshot fell. Looked heavy, but comfortably inside what I purchase for use when the pistol is in service as a bear wrench. The trigger rarely gets pulled on those loads as I don't feel the need to fire rhino rollers to poke a hole in paper, nor do I need to stay familiarized with heavy loads using practice ammunition that is equally as full throttle as the Underwood stuff.
Anyways, knowing my buddy's reloading practices and having done some searching and reading on here, I felt pretty comfortable with using his reloads even though it isn't the same bullet when comparing his charge of Longshot to what I saw here from the boutique manufacturers. But 1300+ FPS in a Commander length barrel, well over what Double Tap gets with the same weight bullet and .6 more grains of powder brought me to a screeching halt. I'm not concerned I harmed the pistol in any way, but I'm not looking for a practice load that beats on the pistol. Or leaves me dealing with leading... (I think I saw a few little lead hairs down the bore, but I forgot about that before running the wire brush down the bore to do the standard cleaning after firing)
The moral of the story is using loads you didn't develop yourself in your own gun is not best practice. Even if you trust the practices of the other reloader, they weren't developed in your gun. All this more true when you're running heavier reloads.
QuoteYour load was not a bad load, even though I saw some primer wipe and other marks that lead me to believe the slide was unlocking a tad early.
I'm relatively new to the 1911 platform, so if you want to expand on causes and dealing with slide unlocking early, feel free. I went up to the 24# spring for the Underwood loads on the advice of Keith from Dan Wesson, perhaps I should be trying a 26# spring?
QuoteAnother thing you may want to check is actual bore size, I have read that some were 0.3990" and that could explain higher pressures and velocities with a better seal...
I hadn't thought that far along the line yet. I have lots of Cerrosafe that gets used for slugging leads, ball seats, and bores for cast bullet use in rifles, so I can certainly do that for the 10mm bore first chance I get.
QuoteBelow are examples of pull downs of the ammo as loaded...
Underwood 220 grain cast load was over LongShot 8.4 and 8.6 grains
Underwood 220 grain reduced was over LongShot 8.0 grains
Double Tap 200gr Wide Flat Nose Hard Cast Gas Checked LongShot 8.2 grains
Double Tap 230gr Hard Cast LongShot 7.2 grains
Thanks, I have looked at those in the past when thinking of what I wanted to develop for a practice load. Has anybody done any testing to determine the hardness of Underwood and Double Tap's offerings? Out of curiosity to compare to this BHN of these Steeler bullets that are advertised as being BHN 18.